All for one, and one for all!

Working hard…but maybe not together.

To each his own - not enough common ground.

Planning

• The group makes a good plan
• Progress towards the goal is consistent

• The group makes plan, but fails to follow through
• Progress toward the goal is inconsistent; some goals are unmet

• No clear plan – just winging it
• Progress is inconsistent or imperceptible; many goals unmet

Teamwork

• Excellent group communication to complete tasks and resolve conflicts
• Work is equally distributed
• Respect shown among all members of the group
• Leadership and responsibility assumed by all members of the group – everyone’s a leader!

• Group communication is adequate to complete tasks and resolve conflicts, though problems may go unattended
• Work is equally distributed
• Respect shown among all members of the group
• Leadership falls to one or two members of the group – others are responsible.

• Group does not communicate well; group may splinter off into mini-groups; confusion as to who is responsible for what tasks
• Work is not equally distributed
• Lack of respect among members; some may feel left out
• Leadership falls on one person, or is grabbed by one person; some group members are not responsible

• Group makes no attempt at communication beyond socializing
• Work is not equally distributed
• Little respect shown among group members
• No clear leadership or sense of responsibility; work all falls to one person and other group members don’t really care

Product

• The end product shows that the group worked together; clear and cohesive design, little repetition of information

• The end product shows that the group made a good effort to work together; clear design, may be repetitive

• The end product shows that the group did not work together well; unclear or fragmented design and frequent repetition of information

• The end product is unsatisfactory; slapped together